| Abstract |
In recent years, our government continues to promote major public economic constructions in order to boost the domestic construction market. However, several reasons, such as the long-period completion, personnel affairs, and variables in construction environment, have caused some problems to occur. Those problems cannot be solved by all parties on a fair, reasonable, honest, and credit basis. As a result, plenty of disputes of contract execution arose.
Owing to the existing problems mentioned before, the purpose of this study is to establish a qualitative theory-based method for the process evaluation of public economic constructions. The reason is that currently in Taiwan there is no such kind of evaluation system concerning from the point of view of risk management can be used to deal with the increasing dispute determination of being unable to execute the projects among all parties.
The negotiation principles were based on FIDIC, Rubinstein, and Game Theory by considering all parties¡¦ benefits and losses. All parties involved in a project took the statistics found in this qualitative study as a reference when coping with the issue of contract execution as well as the following procedures, including mediation, arbitration, and litigation.
This study aims at establishing a specific, qualitative, and theory-based evaluation process and it was used to test real construction projects. In order to avoid unnecessary arbitration and litigation, the test results were for reference purpose of evaluating projects with disputes. Hopefully, the possible negative impacts brought by the dispute determinations can be reduced. |
|---|
